Six weeks ago in Davos, we launched the 2024 ºÚÁÏÉçTrust Barometer, which found that by a nearly two-to-one margin, citizens across 28 markets believe that innovation is being badly managed. Respondents were concerned that government regulation was lagging behind the rapid pace of invention and that business was failing to consider the potential impact on employment or concerns about privacy or lifestyle. This prompted us to suggest that innovation was becoming the fourth log on the populist fire, on top of lack of trust in government, the dispersion of authority to include peers on par with experts, and the mass-class divide on trust in institutions.
I have just returned from four days in San Francisco and Seattle where I provided further detail on the risks to the technology industry of a head-long jump into Artificial Intelligence. I told clients that the pandemic had further weakened the institutional framework of trust, with a politicization of innovation based on rejection of the MRNA vaccine. I asserted that fears about change in status or quality of life are at fever pitch. Most importantly I told them that acceptance of innovation cannot be taken for granted, that we must spend much more of our time on adaptation and education, not just on research and development.
Here are the important findings from our technology study:
The Trust Barometer insights provide an important storm watch advisory to the technology industry. Citizens who have been adversely affected by globalization or changing advice during the pandemic are skeptical about promised innovations. This is the moment for the technology sector to earn its position as the most trusted industry by making change that is understandable to all.
Richard ºÚÁÏÉçis CEO.